Thursday, December 8, 2011

China's Carbon Export

November 2011

Among countries, China recently has become the largest emitter of carbon dioxide. This milestone was reached at an astonishingly rapid pace. The drivers of China’s emissions explosion are obvious, but the policies for dealing with it are more complicated than one might assume. International manufacturing and trade has turned China into the world’s factory. This raises the question, “How much of China’s carbon emissions are exported in the form of the manufactured products to be sold in developed countries?” Researchers at the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems (BBISS) at Georgia Tech, the University of Michigan, and Tsinghua University recently published a study that aims to answer this question. One of their findings is that in 2008, 48% of China's carbon emissions were in the form of exported goods.

Take a look at the abstract for more details: ScienceDirect

Xu, M.; Li, R.; Crittenden, J. C.; Chen, Y.-S. CO2 emissions embodied in China's exports from 2002 to 2008: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2011, 39 (11), 7381-7388.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

The Sustainable Reck Prize Challenge

As part of Georgia Tech’s 2011 Homecoming celebration, the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems is challenging students and alumni to design, build, and enter in the Ramblin' Reck Parade a Fixed Body or Contraption Reck that is NOT powered directly by petroleum based gasoline or diesel internal combustion engines, and has demonstrably lower impacts on the environment and higher benefits to human well-being. The winner of the Sustainable Reck Prize will take home a cool $3,000! Also, the first five teams to register their Sustainable Reck with the BBISS will be eligible for reimbursement of their entry fee and up to $500 in reck related costs.
For complete rules and info on how to register your team:


Friday, July 1, 2011

A Letter to Entering Freshmen at Georgia Tech, Class of 2015

For the last 150 years, the United States has been a global leader in technological innovations of all kinds that have increased prosperity, improved health, and provided positive opportunities for all humans throughout the world. For 125 of those years, Georgia Tech graduates have played a significant role in that long run of human progress, and come August, you will join the ranks of engineers, scientists, architects, managers, planners, industrialists, and entrepreneurs that make it all happen. You will come to campus with the expectation that a Georgia Tech education will help you to understand, engage, and prosper in an ever increasingly complex, competitive, and interconnected world. You expect that your undergraduate training will prepare you for the challenges you will meet throughout your professional and personal lives. Challenges for students entering the college stream in the last decade were terrorism, the rise and fall of the technology market, and worldwide financial collapse. Three decades ago, students were challenged by the Cold War, a new and unknown disease called AIDS, and the stunning rise of Japanese manufacturing prowess. Here in the second decade of the third millennium, your challenges are no less daunting (and perhaps more so):

     Population growth is an ongoing challenge as we prepare to provide 7, 8, and 9 billion people with food, shelter, security, mobility, employment, healthcare, governance, child care, elder care, and more. This must occur amid greater competition for increasingly scarce material and energy resources, and diminishing capacities to assimilate wastes.

     For the first time in human history, more people now reside in urban areas than in rural areas. This trend of urbanization will continue. In developing countries, new infrastructure will need to be built to provide water, housing, transportation, sanitation, communications, and industrial (including energy) production and distribution.  In developed countries, the aging built environment will need to be rebuilt or replaced, and natural systems restored in order for those countries to remain functional and competitive.

     Human caused global climate change now threatens to disrupt the order of nature on which we are dependent. This includes disruptions to the biosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, and atmosphere. Dramatic changes in how energy is produced and used are needed to mitigate further impacts, and for impacts already likely to occur, measures to transition terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to new climate regimes are required (e.g. farms, forests, and fisheries). Additionally, plans must be created and implemented to manage new threats caused by climate change such as increased storm frequencies and intensities, human and other species migrations and extirpations, and transportation and distribution service interruptions.

     As international barriers to communication, transportation, finance, and labor continue to fall, globalization will continue to grow. With it, so too will grow new markets and business opportunities, cultural exchanges, and the flow of goods, people, information, and ideas. This in turn will require new internationally binding rules, laws, and oversight, coordinated diplomatic efforts, and wisdom in navigating foreign lands and cultures born of experience and empathy.

For its part, Georgia Tech must be forever looking across and over the horizon, and constantly revising and adapting its curriculum to meet each new incoming class’ existing and emergent needs and desires. Like every generation prior, the challenges and opportunities that are surfacing are unprecedented in scope and speed and require an altogether new approach to education. So what is it that Georgia Tech is doing, and what is it that you must take advantage of during your time here that will help you meet these challenges?

     At a first level, Georgia Tech is removing barriers to interdisciplinary studies and research. By allowing students to more freely craft a degree curriculum, the Institute is able to respond quickly to the demand for graduates in the cross-over and hybrid careers that are the foundation of the flat world in which proficiency in a single discipline is no longer a guarantor of success. Industrial ecology is a product of the life sciences and engineering in which waste from one process is feedstock to another, leading to lower environmental impacts and higher revenues. Biomimicry "is a new discipline that studies nature’s best ideas and then imitates these designs and processes to solve human problems.”

     In a nod to globalization, Georgia Tech is providing more international experiences. In both sending students abroad and receiving them in-kind, the Institute is expanding the worldviews of students and enabling their ability to see and solve problems from many different perspectives. And through these experiences, students also see that solutions that simply transfer problems to others are unjust. Especially obvious are the environmental kind as these are often the most manifest and tangible.

     Recognizing that even the universities are limited in their ability to foresee the needs and opportunities in the future and prepare students accordingly, schools are putting more emphasis on teaching students how to teach themselves. This includes fostering more undergraduate research and entrepreneurship. In turn, graduates are less bound by the status quo and more able to develop new ideas, technologies, and business ventures that are more effective, profitable, and efficient.

     Finally, at the highest level, the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems is helping Georgia Tech recast its education, research, and service missions around the core concept of sustainability. In so doing, it seeks to align the mission of Georgia Tech with the mission of the next generation of students to create an anthrosphere that exists within the means of nature. That is, to use resources that nature can provide and only generate wastes that nature can assimilate. In adopting this mission, Georgia Tech and its graduates will help provide the developing world opportunities to lead useful and productive lives, and enable the U. S. A. to become the global leader in developing more sustainable technologies, achieve energy self-sufficiency, and become the most generous country in the world again by providing medicines, technology transfer, and aid to people everywhere.

Class of 2015, welcome to Georgia Tech. Go Jackets!



By Michael E. Chang
Deputy Director, Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems

Friday, May 13, 2011

100 Sustainability Articles




The following is a sample of 100 sustainability related publications by investigators at Georgia Tech over the last 5 years (2006-2010) spanning a range of topics including transportation, buildings, energy, environment, metrics, curriculum, decision making, philosophy, climate, natural resources, economics, design, policy, and manufacturing.




  1. Best Practices and Common Approaches for Considering Sustainability at US State Transportation Agencies; Barrella E, Amekudzi AA, Meyer MD, et al.; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD; No. 2174; pp 10-18; 2010.

  2. Switchgrass as an energy crop for biofuel production: A review of its ligno-cellulosic chemical properties; David K, Ragauskas AJ; ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; V3 No. 9; pp 1182-1190; SEP 2010.

  3. Point-based standard optimization with life cycle assessment for product design; Lu D, Realff MJ; COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; V34 No. 9; pp 1356-1364; SEP 7 2010.

  4. Gigaton Problems Need Gigaton Solutions ; Xu M, Crittenden JC, Chen YS, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V44 No. 11; pp. 4037-4041; JUN 1 2010.

  5. Evolution of the Transition to a World Driven by Renewable Energy; Fronk BM, Neal R, Garimella S; JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME; V132 No. 2 Article Number: 021009; JUN 2010.

  6. Optimal decision making on urban renewal projects; Juan YK, Roper KO, Castro-Lacouture D, et al.; MANAGEMENT DECISION; V48 No. 1-2; pp 207-224; 2010.

  7. Foundations of Environmental Sustainability: The Co-evolution of Science and Policy; Norton BG; ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT; V23 No. 1; pp 103-106; MAR 2010.

  8. Evaluating Plan Alternatives for Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region; Jeon CM, Amekudzi AA, Guensler RL; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION; V4 No. 4; pp 227-247; 2010.

  9. The forest products industry at an energy/climate crossroads; Brown MA, Baek Y; ENERGY POLICY; V38 No. 12; pp. 7665-7675; DEC 2010.

  10. Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for an Ethanol Production Process Based on Blue-Green Algae; Luo DX, Hu ZS, Choi DG, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V44 No. 22; pp. 8670-8677; NOV 15 2010.

  11. Statehouse Versus Greenhouse; Drummond WJ; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V76 No. 4; pp. 413-433; 2010.

  12. Maximizing efficiency in the transition to a coal-based economy; Brathwaite J, Horst S, Iacobucci J; ENERGY POLICY; V38 No. 10; pp. 6084-6091; OCT 2010.

  13. A Biologically-Inspired Micro Aerial Vehicle; Ratti J, Vachtsevanos G; JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; V60 No. 1; pp. 153-178; OCT 2010.

  14. Energy Implications of Product Leasing; Intlekofer K, Bras B, Ferguson M; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V44 No. 12; pp. 4409-4415; JUN 15 2010.

  15. Harvesting Waste Thermal Energy Using Carbon-Nanotube-Based Thermo-Electrochemical Cell; Hu RC, Cola BA, Haram N, et al.; NANO LETTERS; V10 No. 3; pp. 838-846; MAR 2010.

  16. Using Aerial Imagery and GIS in Automated Building Footprint Extraction and Shape Recognition for Earthquake Risk Assessment of Urban Inventories; Sahar L, Muthukumar S, French SP; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING; V48 No. 9; pp. 3511-3520; SEP 2010.

  17. Urban Form and Extreme Heat Events: Are Sprawling Cities More Vulnerable to Climate Change Than Compact Cities?; Stone B, Hess JJ, Frumkin H; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES; V118 No. 10; pp. 1425-1428; OCT 2010.

  18. Biomass burning impact on PM2.5 over the southeastern US during 2007: integrating chemically speciated FRM filter measurements, MODIS fire counts and PMF analysis; Zhang X, Hecobian A, Zheng M, et al.; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS; V10 No. 14; pp. 6839-6853; 2010.

  19. Urban and Regional Policy and Its Effects, vol 1; Schaffer WA; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V76 No. 2; pp. 257-258; 2010.

  20. Spatial Dependence and Divergence across Chinese Cities; Ho CY, Li D; REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS; V14 No. 2; pp. 386-403; MAY 2010.

  21. Cost Analysis of Impacts of Climate Change on Regional Air Quality; Liao KJ, Tagaris E, Russell AG, et al.; JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION; V60 No. 2; pp. 195-203; FEB 2010.

  22. Cellulosic biorefineries-unleashing lignin opportunities; Sannigrahi P, Pu YQ, Ragauskas A; CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; V2 No. 5-6; pp. 383-393; DEC 2010.

  23. Designing for a Green Future: A Unified Aircraft Design Methodology; Kernstine K, Boling B, Bortner L, et al.; JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT; V47 No. 5; pp. 1789-1797; SEP-OCT 2010.

  24. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm; Jacobs BW, Singhal VR, Subramanian R; JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; V28 No. 5; pp. 430-441; SEP 2010.

  25. A Framework for Portfolio Management of Renewable Hybrid Energy Sources; Ender TR, Murphy J, Haynes CL; IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL; V4 No. 3; pp. 295-302; SEP 2010.

  26. Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: A review of compositional characteristics; Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ, Tuskan GA; BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR; V4 No. 2; pp. 209-226; MAR-APR 2010.

  27. Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Assessment; Meyer MD; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V76 No. 4; pp. 402-412; 2010.

  28. Power Flow Control in Networks Using Controllable Network Transformers; Das D, Divan DM, Harley RG; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS; V25 No. 7; pp. 1753-1760; JUL 2010.

  29. EXTENDED-RANGE PROBABILISTIC FORECASTS OF GANGES AND BRAHMAPUTRA FLOODS IN BANGLADESH; Webster PJ, Jian J, Hopson TM, et al.; BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY; V91 No. 11; pp. 1493-U121; NOV 2010.

  30. Constructing Carbon Market Spacetime: Climate Change and the Onset of Neo-Modernity; Knox-Hayes J; ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS; V100 No. 4; pp. 953-962; 2010.

  31. Coral records of central tropical Pacific radiocarbon variability during the last millennium; Zaunbrecher LK, Cobb KM, Beck JW, et al.; PALEOCEANOGRAPHY; V25 Article Number: PA4212; NOV 10 2010.

  32. Extended-range seasonal hurricane forecasts for the North Atlantic with a hybrid dynamical-statistical model; Kim HM, Webster PJ; GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS; V37 Article Number: L21705; NOV 9 2010.

  33. Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change; Elliott M; JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY; V17 No. 2; pp. 121-123; 2010.

  34. Accelerated warming of the Southern Ocean and its impacts on the hydrological cycle and sea ice; Liu JP, Curry JA; PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; V107 No. 34; pp. 14987-14992; AUG 24 2010.

  35. Corals in Crisis; Hay ME, Rasher DB; SCIENTIST; V24 No. 8; pp. 42-46; AUG 2010.

  36. Sensitivity of Air Pollution-Induced Premature Mortality to Precursor Emissions under the Influence of Climate Change; Tagaris E, Liao KJ, DeLucia AJ, et al.; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH; V7 No. 5; pp. 2222-2237; MAY 2010.

  37. How To Cool the Planet: Geoengineering and the Audacious Quest To Fix the Earth's Climate; Baer W; LIBRARY JOURNAL; V135 No. 6; pp. 92-92; APR 1 2010.

  38. GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies; Juan YK, Kim JH, Roper K, et al.; AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION; V18 No. 4; pp 394-401; JUL 2009.

  39. Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles ; Bradley TH, Frank AA; RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS; V13 No. 1; pp 104-117; JAN 2009.

  40. Comparison of Design Methods for Fuel-Cell-Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; Bradley TH, Moffitt BA, Fuller TF, et al.; JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT; V46 No. 6; pp. 1945-1956; NOV-DEC 2009.

  41. Critical Interfaces in Organic Solar Cells and Their Influence on the Open-Circuit Voltage; Potscavage WJ, Sharma A, Kippelen B; ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH; V42 No. 11; pp. 1758-1767; NOV 2009.

  42. Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards?; Chandler J; ENERGY POLICY; V37 No. 8; pp. 3274-3281; AUG 2009.

  43. Performance of Li-ion secondary batteries in low power, hybrid power supplies; Prakash S, Mustain WE, Kohl PA; JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES; V189 No. 2; pp. 1184-1189; APR 15 2009.

  44. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change.; Brown MA; REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH; V26 No. 1-2; pp. 228-231; JAN-MAR 2009.

  45. Land Use as Climate Change Mitigation; Stone B; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V43 No. 24; pp. 9052-9056; DEC 15 2009.

  46. Global Universities and Urban Development: Case Studies and Analysis; Etienne HF; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY; V23 No. 3; pp. 267-267; AUG 2009.

  47. Roadside, Urban, and Rural Comparison of Primary and Secondary Organic Molecular Markers in Ambient PM2.5; Yan B, Zheng M, Hu YT, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V43 No. 12; pp. 4287-4293; JUN 15 2009.

  48. Socio-demographic and built environment influences on the odds of being overweight or obese: The Atlanta experience; Bodea TD, Garrow LA, Meyer MD, et al.; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE; V43 No. 4; pp. 430-444; MAY 2009.

  49. At Home in the Seamless Web Agency, Obduracy, and the Ethics of Metropolitan Growth; Kirkman R; SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES; V34 No. 2; pp. 234-258; MAR 2009.

  50. Quantification of the impact of climate uncertainty on regional air quality; Liao KJ, Tagaris E, Manomaiphiboon K, et al.; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS; V9 No. 3; pp. 865-878; 2009.

  51. Assessment of Biomass Burning Emissions and Their Impacts on Urban and Regional PM2.5: A Georgia Case Study; Tian D, Hu YT, Wang YH, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V43 No. 2; pp. 299-305; JAN 15 2009.

  52. Efficient Take-Back Legislation; Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Sarvary M; PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; V18 No. 3; pp. 243-258; MAY-JUN 2009.

  53. The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework: Drawing Attention to Inequality within Nations in the Global Climate Policy Debate; Baer P, Kartha S, Athanasiou T, et al.; DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE; V40 No. 6; pp. 1121-1138; NOV 2009.

  54. Relation of biofuel to bioelectricity and agriculture: Food security, fuel security, and reducing greenhouse emissions; Thomas VM, Choi DG, Luo D, et al.; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN; V87 No. 9A Special No. Sp. Iss. SI; pp. 1140-1146; SEP 2009.

  55. Late 20th century warming and freshening in the central tropical Pacific; Nurhati IS, Cobb KM, Charles CD, et al.; GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS; V36 Article Number: L21606; NOV 12 2009.

  56. Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources; Choi S, Drese JH, Jones CW; CHEMSUSCHEM; V2 No. 9; pp. 796-854; 2009.

  57. The Value of Quality Grading in Remanufacturing; Ferguson M, Guide VD, Koca E, et al.; PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; V18 No. 3; pp. 300-314; MAY-JUN 2009.

  58. AEC plus P plus F INTEGRATION WITH GREEN PROJECT DELIVERY AND LEAN FOCUS; Castro-Lacouture D, Ospina-Alvarado AM, Roper KO; JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDINGV3 No. 4; pp 154-169; FALL 2008.

  59. Comparative assessment of lunar propellant options; Stanley DO, Martinez RM; JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS; V45 No. 4; pp 776-784; JUL-AUG 2008.

  60. Extending Amdahl's Law for Energy-Efficient Computing in the Many-Core Era; Woo DH, Lee HHS; COMPUTER; V41 No. 12; pp. 24-+; DEC 2008.

  61. Simulations of absorbance efficiency and power production of three dimensional tower arrays for use in photovoltaics; Flicker J, Ready J; JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS; V103 No. 11 Article Number: 113110; JUN 1 2008.

  62. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment; Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, et al.; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; V13 No. 5; pp. 374-388; AUG 2008.

  63. The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance; Peponis J, Bafna S, Zhang ZY; ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN; V35 No. 5; pp. 881-901; SEP 2008.

  64. The Future of GIS in Planning: Converging Technologies and Diverging Interests; Drummond WJ, French SP; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V74 No. 2; pp. 161-174; 2008.

  65. Optimization of community health center locations and service offerings with statistical need estimation; Griffin PM, Scherrer CR, Swann JL; IIE TRANSACTIONS; V40 No. 9; pp. 880-892; 2008.

  66. Development of ambient air quality population-weighted metrics for use in time-series health studies; Ivy D, Mulholland JA, Russell AG; JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION; V58 No. 5; pp. 711-720; MAY 2008.

  67. Simulation of air quality impacts from prescribed fires on an urban area; Hu YT, Odman MT, Chang ME, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V42 No. 10; pp. 3676-3682; MAY 15 2008.

  68. Choices versus choice sets: a commuting spectrum method for representing job-housing possibilities; Yang JW, Ferreira J; ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN; V35 No. 2; pp. 364-378; MAR 2008.

  69. Understanding the inputs into innovation: Do cities substitute for internal firm resources?; Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S; JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY; V17 No. 2; pp. 295-316; SUM 2008.

  70. Diagnosis of aged prescribed burning plumes impacting an urban area; Lee S, Kim HK, Yan B, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V42 No. 5; pp. 1438-1444; MAR 1 2008.

  71. Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy; Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove LN; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; V54 No. 10; pp. 1731-1746; OCT 2008.

  72. The new forestry biofuels sector; Pu YQ, Zhang DC, Singh PM, et al.; BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR; V2 No. 1; pp. 58-73; JAN-FEB 2008.

  73. Development of a methodology for improving photovoltaic inverter reliability; Ristow A, Begovic M, Pregelj A, et al.; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS; V55 No. 7; pp. 2581-2592; JUL 2008.

  74. Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible delivery; Wang T, Toktay BL; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; V54 No. 4; pp. 716-732; APR 2008.

  75. Conceptual study of distributed CO2 capture and the sustainable carbon economy; Damm DL, Fedorov AG; ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT; V49 No. 6; pp. 1674-1683; JUN 2008.

  76. CHED 15-Infusing sustainability across the curriculum using our green chemistry project as a model; Collard DM, Smith JC, Kaplan LJ; ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY; V234; AUG 19 2007.

  77. Modeling of data center airflow and heat transfer: State of the art and future trends; Rambo J, Joshi Y; DISTRIBUTED AND PARALLEL DATABASES; V21 No. 2-3; pp. 193-225; JUN 2007.

  78. Characterization of fuel gas products from the treatment of solid waste streams with a plasma arc torch; Vaidyanathan A, Mulholland J, Ryu J, et al.; JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; V82 No. 1; pp. 77-82; JAN 2007.

  79. Transportation planning and infrastructure delivery in major cities and megacities; Amekudzi AA, Thomas-Mobley L, Ross C; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD No. 1997; pp. 17-23; 2007.

  80. Urban and rural temperature trends in proximity to large US cities: 1951-2000; Stone B; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY; V27 No. 13; pp. 1801-1807; NOV 15 2007.

  81. Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States; Tagaris E, Manomaiphiboon K, Liao KJ, et al.; JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES; V112 No. D14 Article Number: D14312; JUL 31 2007.

  82. A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States; Weber RJ, Sullivan AP, Peltier RE, et al.; JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES; V112 No. D13 Article Number: D13302; JUL 6 2007.

  83. Understanding "urban planning in China"; Yang JW; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V73 No. 2; pp. 238-238; SPR 2007.

  84. The role of bathhouses and sex clubs in HIV transmission - Findings from a mathematic model; Faissol DM, Swann JL, Kolodziejski B, et al.; JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES; V44 No. 4; pp. 386-394; APR 1 2007.

  85. Finding an impact of preservation policies: Price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in Chicago, 1990-1999; Noonan DS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY; V21 No. 1; pp. 17-33; FEB 2007.

  86. From honeybees to Internet servers: biomimicry for distributed management of Internet hosting centers; Nakrani S, Tovey C; BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS; V2 No. 4; pp. S182-S197; DEC 2007.

  87. GREEN BUILDING POLICY OPTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR; Pearce AR, DuBose JR, Bosch SJ; JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING; V2 No. 1; pp. 156-174; WIN 2007.

  88. Tunable solvents for fine chemicals from the biorefinery; Eckert C, Liotta C, Ragauskas A, et al.; GREEN CHEMISTRY; V9 No. 6; pp. 545-548; JUN 2007.

  89. Developing an 'energy sustainability index' to evaluate energy policy; Brown MA, Sovacool BK; INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS; V32 No. 4; pp. 335-349; DEC 2007.

  90. Stakeholder perceptions of scientists: Lake Tahoe environmental policy from 1984 to 2001; Weible CM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; V40 No. 6; pp. 853-865; DEC 2007.

  91. Transportation system Sustainability issues in high-, middle-, and low-income economies: Case studies from Georgia (US), South Korea, Colombia, and Ghana; Jeon CM, Amekudzi AA, Vanegas J; JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE; V132 No. 3; pp 172-186; SEP 2006.

  92. Deconstructing to redevelop - A sustainable alternative to mechanical demolition; Leigh NG, Patterson LM; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION; V72 No. 2; pp 217-225; SPR 2006.

  93. Advanced technologies for earthquake risk inventories; French SP, Muthukumar S; JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; V10 No. 2; pp. 207-236; MAR 2006.

  94. Modeling study of air pollution due to the manufacture of export goods in China's Pearl River Delta; Streets DG, Yu C, Bergin MH, et al.; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY; V40 No. 7; pp. 2099-2107; APR 1 2006.

  95. The influence of aerosols on crop production: A study using the CERES crop model; Greenwald R, Bergin MH, Xu J, et al.; AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS; V89 No. 2-3; pp. 390-413; SEP 2006.

  96. Urban form and watershed management: how zoning influences residential stormwater volumes; Stone B, Bullen JL; ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN; V33 No. 1; pp. 21-37; JAN 2006.

  97. Numerical studies of the effects of active and passive circulation enhancement concepts on wind turbine performance; Tongchitpakdee C, Benjanirat S, Sankar LN; JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME; V128 No. 4; pp. 432-444; NOV 2006.

  98. Mixing politics and science in testing the hypothesis that greenhouse warming is causing a global increase in hurricane intensity; Curry JA, Webster PJ, Holland GJ; BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY; V87 No. 8; pp. 1025-+; AUG 2006.

  99. Joint life-cycle dynamics of new and remanufactured products; Debo LG, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN; PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; V15 No. 4; pp. 498-513; WIN 2006.

  100. The effect of competition on recovery strategies; Ferguson ME, Toktay LB; PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; V15 No. 3; pp. 351-368; FAL 2006.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Winning!

2011 I2S Winning Team.  Click to Play Video
Urban RePeel, a team consisting of Jared McGrath and Ryan Ravanelle from the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems, and Nicole Sullivan from Environmental Engineering, won the 2011 Georgia Tech  Ideas To SERVE competition. In addition, the team also picked up the People’s Choice Award for the poster competition and runner-up in the overall People’s Choice Award. Urban RePeel aims to collect food waste from densely populated urban areas, where food waste rates approach 50%, and transform it into high quality fertilizer with the help of red wriggler worms grown on an industrial scale.  The worms can eat their own weight in food waste every day, and excrete an organic fertilizer that is highly coveted by gardeners as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. This cyclical solution solves several problems at once. 
  • American municipalities pay $1 billion a year to haul food waste to rapidly filling landfills where it decomposes releasing greenhouse gases. 
  • The substitution of synthetic fertilizers with an organic alternative prevents pollution of waterways from runoff and results in healthier and more productive plants.
  • Organic fertilizers also reduce dependence on fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions because their production is energy intensive and uses natural gas as a feedstock.
Ideas To SERVE (I2S) is an annual student competition where teams present ideas for products, ventures or services that simultaneously solve social and environmental problems as well as demonstrate that they can be financially self-sustaining.  The I2S competition is organized by the Institute for Leadership and Entrepreneurship at the Georgia Tech College of Management.  This year’s sponsors are:
  • Gray Ghost Ventures
  • MaRC Sustainable Design & Manufacturing
  • Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems
  • College of Management
  • Tedd Munchak Chair in Entrepreneurship
  • Institute for Leadership and Entrepreneurship
Additional Links:

Friday, February 11, 2011

How to Earn a Degree in Sustainability at Georgia Tech

In the latter half of the 1800s, there was no better career advice than to “go West young man.”[1] In the latter half of the 1900s, success was summarized and made famous in one word: “plastics.”[2] And so it is that every generation gets advice on how to succeed, and today there is no higher career calling than one that is “sustainable.” Nations concerned about security, scientists concerned about climate change, corporations concerned about costs, consumers concerned about value, and parents concerned about the world that their children will inherit are all pointing towards a future world painted green. It is no surprise then that the students now on the doorstep of our colleges and universities are wanting to prepare themselves to seize what could be the greatest opportunity since the first Industrial Revolution. At Georgia Tech, many enterprising students have already figured out how to get a degree in sustainability, even if those words are not stamped on their diploma at graduation. For the many more yearning for clearer direction, here is your roadmap.

There are a handful of universities and colleges that in recent years have begun to offer explicitly a BS, MS, or PhD degree in sustainability. Like any other discipline, students enter these programs and are introduced and indoctrinated into the theory and practice of the field, but at the same time, are isolated from the population of other students and worldviews that are being taught at the same place of higher learning. Within these schools and colleges, faculty are hired, courses are developed, and degree curriculum requirements are established. Follow the formula and one can earn her BS in four years, MS in two, and PhD in five. This is good. It offers students a clear means to a clear end. But it is not the Georgia Tech way (easy never is).

There is a long running series of commercials for canned tuna that always includes the lines: “Starkist doesn’t want tuna with good taste. Starkist wants tuna that tastes good.” With a twist of a few words, that could be Georgia Tech’s approach to sustainability education. “Georgia Tech doesn’t want practicing sustainable engineers. Georgia Tech wants engineers practicing sustainability.”  From the Institute’s first dalliances in sustainability in the early 1990s, a conscious decision was made to not create a new discipline within a new school and offering new courses and new degrees. Instead, it was decided to infuse and incorporate sustainability into all of the existing degree programs already at Georgia Tech. With a $1 million grant from the General Electric Foundation in 1992, the Institute leaped into the challenge and quickly accomplished this aim. Today, there are elements of sustainability in every program of study. Rather than just teach about technology, faculty will now challenge students to consider the social, economic, and environmental impacts of technology (and more often than not, it is the students that challenge the faculty). A couple decades ago, this was a radical change for a technological research university. Georgia Tech’s Dean of Engineering at the time characterized it as “a change in mindset, not just a change in problem set.” Today, it is probably safe to say that such integration is expected, and some other universities have even caught on and are taking the same steps that Georgia Tech did years ago. Their students are demanding it. Their young faculty are demanding it. The market is demanding it.

Today, empathy is still a necessary characteristic of sustainability, but it is not sufficient. Proficiency is also required, and for enterprising students, this is where Georgia Tech shines. Few universities have as few barriers as Georgia Tech – intellectual or administrative – to the movement of students, faculty, and ideas in and out of its schools and colleges. Such flexibility allows students to piece together programs of study that on the surface appear to be distant and disconnected, but are wholly necessary for the world they are entering. Take the college career path of one recent Georgia Tech graduate, a Udall Scholarship winner. Thomas Christian earned simultaneous degrees in Earth & Atmospheric Sciences and International Affairs while also serving in an internship with the CIA. One short generation ago, fresh graduates hit the streets as newly minted engineers, or scientists, or businessmen, or doctors, or lawyers, or any of tens or hundreds of other identities. I’m still not sure what Thomas is (Scientist? Diplomat? Information Analyst?), and by no means could a university bureaucracy be creative enough or nimble enough to create an a priori program of study like his. But to solve the most vexing problems that we might see in the next 50 to 100 years (like negotiating carbon emissions agreements between nations, or the humanitarian caring of environmental refugees, or understanding the opportunities that present themselves as variations in culture across a global economic marketplace), my money is much more on the men and women that have figured it out, like Thomas Christian, than it is on the focused single minded majority that are still the norm (no matter how competent they are).


Real degrees in sustainability don’t have the word “sustainability” scrawled across them in 32 point Old English type. But a fully credentialed graduate of sustainability is easy to spot. They are the ones that are using their choices in electives, minors, co-ops, internships, and research programs to reach outside of their primary degree disciplines. They are the ones leaving Georgia Tech with resumes that sport an abundance of “&’s” such as: BS degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineering & Public Policy; or MS in Mechanical Engineering & Minor in Economics; or PhD in Biology, Thesis: Honeybee Production & the Logistics of Industrial Manufacturing. And after they graduate, they are the ones that are making the greatest positive difference in the lives of people, & the health of the planet, & the wealth of all.


One day soon, Georgia Tech may be able to offer a clearer path to a degree in sustainability. In early 2011, a committee was formed to explore the creation of Georgia Tech’s 7th college. If the faculty can figure out how to make it work, the “X College” will join the Colleges of Engineering, Science, Architecture, Management, Computing, and Liberal Arts. “‘The X-College Initiative grew from the very strong recommendations from students and faculty in the strategic planning process that Georgia Tech needs to increase student-faculty interaction and allow more flexibility in curricula,’ said Richard Barke, an associate professor in the School of Public Policy and chair of the X-College planning committee. ‘For example, the X-College is considering whether to allow students — with strong faculty guidance — to compose programs of study that focus on particular grand challenges facing society, using knowledge from a wide range of relevant fields. The committee is investigating how to achieve these goals while balancing disciplinary and interdisciplinary learning, maintaining the traditional rigor of a Tech education, innovating in learning techniques and educational technologies, and respecting the expectations of graduate schools and employers.’”[3] Thus if X is the future, a few years from now, my advice to students seeking degrees in sustainability will be to “Go ‘X’ young man!” But until that time, “Go ‘&’ young man!” will have to do.

By Michael E. Chang
Deputy Director, Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems

[1] Horace Greeley, Editor of the New York Tribune certainly popularized the phrase though there seems to be some uncertainty in whether or not he was the original source.


[2] From the movie “The Graduate” (1967).


[3] Provost Forms Committee to Develop ‘X-College’ Initiative; GT News Release; January 7, 2011; Atlanta, GA; http://www.gatech.edu/newsroom/release.html?nid=63418